The Lord of the Rings books were once the most popular books for men. They are about a hobbit, Frodo, who must take the one ring, an evil power made to rule others, to Mount Doom, a volcano, to destroy the ring. J.R.R Tolkein's The Two Towers fascinated me with interesting creatures.
A theme of the book is how power causes corruption. In the book, the opportunity to seize nearly limited power from the ring often turns good people to evil, sometimes permanently. First, Saruman joined with Sauron because he wanted to be on the winning side. Then, he tried to get the hobbits before Sauron did so he could take the power himself. Last, Gollum, a horrible, miserable creature, was driven mad by the power of the ring and now spends every waking moment trying to get it back.
The book's theme of the corruption caused by power holds true to the real world. Napolean Bonaparte became corrupted and thought of himself as an all-powerful person. He then tried to take over Europe through military conquest. He ultimately failed and was exiled to Saint Helena for the remainder of his life.
The book takes place in an imaginary world called "Middle-Earth." There is an evil power that has built up there and the previously peaceful governments have been thrown into a war with Sauron and the evil wizard, Saruman. One way this affects the conflict of the novel is that people are no longer as trusting with strangers as they were before. This makes it difficult for Frodo to get help from strangers when he is in need of assistance. A second way this affects the conflict is that the wilderness is always dangerous. The Enemy has his servants running around all over Middle-Earth. A third way this affects the conflict is the challenges that the characters face from the weather and environment often dictate their route through Middle-Earth.
I would recommend this book anyone looking for a longer read.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Sunday, January 27, 2013
CC2: Gun Control
Eric Talmadge, a writer for Yahoo! News, states in his article, "Around world, gun rules, and results, vary wildly," that laws regarding guns seem to have little to do with how much gun violence there is in a particular country.
In the article, Eric Talmadge states, "Guns were used in only seven murders in Japan — a nation of about 130 million — in all of 2011, the most recent year for official statistics." This country is a case where gun regulations actually seem to work. Violence overall is minimal in Japan, likely thanks to their culture.
In the article, Eric Talmadge states, "Guns were used in only seven murders in Japan — a nation of about 130 million — in all of 2011, the most recent year for official statistics." This country is a case where gun regulations actually seem to work. Violence overall is minimal in Japan, likely thanks to their culture.
Also stated by Eric Talmadge in the article, "Gun-rights advocates in the United States often cite Switzerland as an example of relatively liberal regulation going hand-in-hand with low gun crime. The country's 8 million people own about 2.3 million firearms. But firearms were used in just 24 Swiss homicides in 2009, a rate of about 0.3 per 100,000 inhabitants." Switzerland is a somewhat rare example of a country with loose gun laws as well as low gun violence. This country seems to be one of the few that have figured out how to manage guns.
Eric Talmadge also states in the article, "According to a 2011 study by the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime, 34,678 people were murdered by firearms in Brazil in 2008, compared to 34,147 in 2007." In spite of strict laws that nearly ban all guns, Brazil has some of the worst gun violence in the world. Brazil is evidence that strict regulations on guns is not the answer to the U.S.'s woes.
Benjamin Franklin once said, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." It is unwise to just give up rights to and give more power to the government, because once they have that power, they will never let go of it.
The laws regarding guns that governments impose seem to have little effect compared to other variables. These laws are not completely without influence, but gun violence cannot be stopped by those laws alone.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
What is your American Dream?
The American Dream is not, nor should it be, something that is easily obtained. The American Dream can only be achieved through a great amount of hard work and perseverance. For me, that dream is to achieve happiness in all aspects of my life, both at home and at work.
In my American Dream, I have a job that I not only earn a decent amount of money from, but I also can derive some sort of joy from while performing my day-to-day duties. I would like to earn enough money so that I never have to worry about how I am to put food on the table every night or how I am to pay the next house payment. I dream to make enough money to never worry about how much I have. I wish to have a job that allows me to be happy while I work. I do not wish to be yet another person who dreads waking up in the morning to go to their job that they hate and be around people they cannot stand. I may not know what this dream job is yet, but I plan to continue searching until I someday discover that perfect job.
In my American Dream, I return from my job to a nice home and a loving family. I hope to acquire a house that will allow my family and me to live comfortably and without squalor. I do not want a giant mansion that occupies enough space for ten families, but I do want a house that is spacious enough to not feel cramped. I wish to live with a kind, happy family that I can support. I hope to provide what they need to lead successful lives. I do not know where this perfect home or who this perfect family is yet, but I hope to one day find them.
I understand that my American Dream is not achievable by all, even if they work their absolute hardest to get there. My American Dream may not even be achievable by me, but I plan to try my best to get there, nonetheless.
Sunday, January 13, 2013
CC1: Trillion-Dollar Coin
Matthew Larotonda, a writer for Yahoo! News, states in his article, "Trillion-Dollar Coin? WH Says No Way," that the White House has shot down the idea of minting a trillion-dollar coin to attempt to solve the National Debt problem.
In the article, Matthew Larotonda states, "The Obama administration has killed any notion of minting trillion-dollar platinum coins to solve the nation's debt ceiling woes." Obama does not want to try to use underhanded and potentially dangerous means to solve the National Debt Crisis. He wants to solve the problem by actually fixing it rather than by making it worse in the long run.
Also stated by Larotonda in the article, "In a written statement released Saturday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says there are only "two options" to deal with the looming need for the U.S. government to pay creditors for federal funding it has already spent." The White House knows that the idea of using the coin to pay off the debt is ridiculous. They know that, in order for the debt to be paid off, the budget must be balanced, otherwise, the problem will return.
Larotonda also states in the article, "While there are laws in place to regulate how much paper, gold, silver or copper currency can be circulated by the government, there is nothing so clearly stated when it comes to platinum." Obama knows that circumventing our own laws would look very bad on our part. This would be damaging to the reputation of the U.S. in the rest of the world and would set a very bad example for other governments follow.
This reminds me of kids in school cheating to get better grades. Rather than doing the right thing and working to do better and fix a problem that they caused themselves, they choose to use underhanded tactics to make their grade better.
The idea of disregarding our own laws and regulations and paying off our debt in such a silly way is a bit of a joke. Even if it wouldn't cause serious inflation and damage to the economy, doing so would be hypocritical of the U.S. government, since they have rules and regulations against it.
In the article, Matthew Larotonda states, "The Obama administration has killed any notion of minting trillion-dollar platinum coins to solve the nation's debt ceiling woes." Obama does not want to try to use underhanded and potentially dangerous means to solve the National Debt Crisis. He wants to solve the problem by actually fixing it rather than by making it worse in the long run.
Also stated by Larotonda in the article, "In a written statement released Saturday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says there are only "two options" to deal with the looming need for the U.S. government to pay creditors for federal funding it has already spent." The White House knows that the idea of using the coin to pay off the debt is ridiculous. They know that, in order for the debt to be paid off, the budget must be balanced, otherwise, the problem will return.
Larotonda also states in the article, "While there are laws in place to regulate how much paper, gold, silver or copper currency can be circulated by the government, there is nothing so clearly stated when it comes to platinum." Obama knows that circumventing our own laws would look very bad on our part. This would be damaging to the reputation of the U.S. in the rest of the world and would set a very bad example for other governments follow.
This reminds me of kids in school cheating to get better grades. Rather than doing the right thing and working to do better and fix a problem that they caused themselves, they choose to use underhanded tactics to make their grade better.
The idea of disregarding our own laws and regulations and paying off our debt in such a silly way is a bit of a joke. Even if it wouldn't cause serious inflation and damage to the economy, doing so would be hypocritical of the U.S. government, since they have rules and regulations against it.
Sunday, December 16, 2012
The Fellowship of the Ring Book Review
The Lord of the Rings books were once the most popular books for men.They are about a hobbit, Frodo, who must take the one ring, an evil power made to rule others, to a volcano to destroy the ring. J.R.R Tolkien's The Fellowship of the Ring bored me with its dry writing.
One theme of the book is how power corrupts. The book shows that power or the chance of it can turn even good people into evil people that are obsessed with power. First, Isildur had a chance to destroy the ring, but he wanted the power the ring had so he took the ring for himself. Then, Smeagol killed his friend because he wanted the power of the ring for himself. Last, Boromir attempted to take the ring from Frodo because he wanted the power that the ring had.
This book connects with the real world in multiple ways. One way is the theme of the book, power corrupts, holds true to the real world. Any one of a number of corrupt politicians is a good example of this. The Lord of the Rings books also show the decline of power that is inevitable for every nation. The Elves decline in power and must leave Middle-Earth. In the real world, the Roman empire was once a powerful nation, but it declined and ceased to exist.
The setting of the book is in an imaginary place called "Middle-Earth." There is an evil power that is building up there and the previously peaceful governments will soon be thrown into a war with Sauron. One way this affects the conflict of the novel is that people are no longer as trusting with strangers as they were before. This makes it difficult for Frodo to get help from strangers when he is in need of assistance. A second way this affects the conflict is that the wilderness is always dangerous. The Enemy has his servants running around all over Middle-Earth. A third way this affects the conflict is the challenges that the characters face from the weather and environment often dictate their route through Middle-Earth.
Despite its dry writing, I would recommend this book to be read.
One theme of the book is how power corrupts. The book shows that power or the chance of it can turn even good people into evil people that are obsessed with power. First, Isildur had a chance to destroy the ring, but he wanted the power the ring had so he took the ring for himself. Then, Smeagol killed his friend because he wanted the power of the ring for himself. Last, Boromir attempted to take the ring from Frodo because he wanted the power that the ring had.
This book connects with the real world in multiple ways. One way is the theme of the book, power corrupts, holds true to the real world. Any one of a number of corrupt politicians is a good example of this. The Lord of the Rings books also show the decline of power that is inevitable for every nation. The Elves decline in power and must leave Middle-Earth. In the real world, the Roman empire was once a powerful nation, but it declined and ceased to exist.
The setting of the book is in an imaginary place called "Middle-Earth." There is an evil power that is building up there and the previously peaceful governments will soon be thrown into a war with Sauron. One way this affects the conflict of the novel is that people are no longer as trusting with strangers as they were before. This makes it difficult for Frodo to get help from strangers when he is in need of assistance. A second way this affects the conflict is that the wilderness is always dangerous. The Enemy has his servants running around all over Middle-Earth. A third way this affects the conflict is the challenges that the characters face from the weather and environment often dictate their route through Middle-Earth.
Despite its dry writing, I would recommend this book to be read.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Current Connection #5
Foster Klug, a writer for Yahoo! News, states in his article, "NKorea says it will launch long-range rocket soon," that North Korea is continuing to launch missiles in spite of U.S. and South Korean pressure to stop.
In the article, Foster Klug states, "North Korea announced Saturday that it would attempt to launch a long-range rocket in mid-December, a defiant move just eight months after a failed April bid was widely condemned as a violation of a U.N. ban against developing its nuclear and missile programs." North Korea has decided to continues to go against The United Nations yet again by continuing its illegal programs. This can only serve to worsen political relations between North Korea and the rest of the world.
Foster Klug also states in the article, "The planned launch window — Dec 10 - 22 — comes as President Barack Obama prepares for his second term and as South Korea holds presidential elections Dec. 19." It is possible that North Korea feels that they can more easily get away with causing trouble since Obama is president again as he will not react as strongly as a more conservative president. It is also possible that North Korea is trying to influence the South Korean election by causing political trouble.
The article by Foster Klug also states, "It would be North Korea's second launch attempt under leader Kim Jong Un, who took power following his father Kim Jong Il's death nearly a year ago."Just like his father and grandfather, Kim Jong Un seems to have no intentions to ever work with other countries. This seems to be a family of leaders bent on causing mayhem and starving their people.
This sort of reminds me of elementary school bullies. They do whatever they want with no real consequences because they're just little kids. The little punishment put upon them doesn't really bother them so they just keep antagonizing everyone.
North Korea has been bothering the world with their missile and nuclear programs for quite a while now. They are a danger and an annoyance to the rest of the countries of the world and if it wasn't for China it is unlikely that North Korea could even continue to exist.
In the article, Foster Klug states, "North Korea announced Saturday that it would attempt to launch a long-range rocket in mid-December, a defiant move just eight months after a failed April bid was widely condemned as a violation of a U.N. ban against developing its nuclear and missile programs." North Korea has decided to continues to go against The United Nations yet again by continuing its illegal programs. This can only serve to worsen political relations between North Korea and the rest of the world.
Foster Klug also states in the article, "The planned launch window — Dec 10 - 22 — comes as President Barack Obama prepares for his second term and as South Korea holds presidential elections Dec. 19." It is possible that North Korea feels that they can more easily get away with causing trouble since Obama is president again as he will not react as strongly as a more conservative president. It is also possible that North Korea is trying to influence the South Korean election by causing political trouble.
The article by Foster Klug also states, "It would be North Korea's second launch attempt under leader Kim Jong Un, who took power following his father Kim Jong Il's death nearly a year ago."Just like his father and grandfather, Kim Jong Un seems to have no intentions to ever work with other countries. This seems to be a family of leaders bent on causing mayhem and starving their people.
This sort of reminds me of elementary school bullies. They do whatever they want with no real consequences because they're just little kids. The little punishment put upon them doesn't really bother them so they just keep antagonizing everyone.
North Korea has been bothering the world with their missile and nuclear programs for quite a while now. They are a danger and an annoyance to the rest of the countries of the world and if it wasn't for China it is unlikely that North Korea could even continue to exist.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Current Connection #4
Ibrahim Barzak and Karin Laub, a pair of writers for Yahoo! News, state in their article, "Palestinian civilian toll climbs in Gaza," that as Israeli strikes against Hamas rocket launching stations and Hamas military leaders, Palestinian civilians continue to get killed in the crossfire.
In the article Ibrahim Barzak and Karin Laub state, "Israeli aircraft struck crowded areas in the Gaza Strip on Monday, driving up the Palestinian death toll to 94 and devastating several homes belonging to one clan as Israel broadened its targets in the 6-day-old offensive meant to quell Hamas rocket fire on Israel." As Israel attacks targets in Gaza to stop the rocket fire, they also accidentally kill many Palestinian civilians. Understandably, the Palestinians aren't happy about this.
Barzak and Laub also state, "Escalating its bombing campaign, Israel on Sunday began attacking homes of activists in Hamas, the Islamic militant group that rules Gaza." The activists often have several people living in their homes or are living in the homes of other people. This cowering behind civilians is the cause of many civilian casualties.
Also stated in the article, "Hamas fighters, meanwhile, have fired hundreds of rockets into Israel in the current round of fighting, including 75 on Monday, among them one that hit an empty school." The murder of civilians is not a crime committed exclusively by Israel. Hamas continues its unjustified assault on Israel with rocket fire, encouraging even more action from Israel to stop the rocket fire.
This reminds me of the beginning of many wars throughout history. One country does something little and (often unintentionally) provokes a response from the other. The other country then responds negatively and the original country responds negatively back. This cycle gets worse and worse until a full-scale war begins, causing massive damage to both countries as well as destroying the lives of many innocent people. Thus the saying, "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind," was born.
Though Israel is not specifically targeting civilians, Israel is killing them and that is making Hamas and the rest of the world more and more unhappy with them. It may be wise for Israel, a widely hated country, to discontinue its attacks on Hamas leaders, even if those attacks are completely justified.
In the article Ibrahim Barzak and Karin Laub state, "Israeli aircraft struck crowded areas in the Gaza Strip on Monday, driving up the Palestinian death toll to 94 and devastating several homes belonging to one clan as Israel broadened its targets in the 6-day-old offensive meant to quell Hamas rocket fire on Israel." As Israel attacks targets in Gaza to stop the rocket fire, they also accidentally kill many Palestinian civilians. Understandably, the Palestinians aren't happy about this.
Barzak and Laub also state, "Escalating its bombing campaign, Israel on Sunday began attacking homes of activists in Hamas, the Islamic militant group that rules Gaza." The activists often have several people living in their homes or are living in the homes of other people. This cowering behind civilians is the cause of many civilian casualties.
Also stated in the article, "Hamas fighters, meanwhile, have fired hundreds of rockets into Israel in the current round of fighting, including 75 on Monday, among them one that hit an empty school." The murder of civilians is not a crime committed exclusively by Israel. Hamas continues its unjustified assault on Israel with rocket fire, encouraging even more action from Israel to stop the rocket fire.
This reminds me of the beginning of many wars throughout history. One country does something little and (often unintentionally) provokes a response from the other. The other country then responds negatively and the original country responds negatively back. This cycle gets worse and worse until a full-scale war begins, causing massive damage to both countries as well as destroying the lives of many innocent people. Thus the saying, "an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind," was born.
Though Israel is not specifically targeting civilians, Israel is killing them and that is making Hamas and the rest of the world more and more unhappy with them. It may be wise for Israel, a widely hated country, to discontinue its attacks on Hamas leaders, even if those attacks are completely justified.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)